Another Reason The U.N. Should Be Disbanded Is What?
The U.N. nuclear watchdog chief, Mohamad ElBaradei, said a military strike on Iran would turn the Middle East into a fireball and prompt Tehran to launch a crash course to build nuclear weapons.
Crash course? They’re not at it already and haven’t been at it for years now? How could I have been so misled? You mean all this time, the Iranians have NOT been trying to build nukes to arm their ballistic missiles with? It’s all just a rumor?
If you want to hear assinine statements from Muslims, you don’t have to go far because they all pour it on, it seems to be part of being Islamic. Baradei is no different, braying like a jackass and with the same level of intelligence.
His statement came after The New York Times quoted U.S. officials as saying Israel had carried out a large military exercise which looked like a rehearsal for bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities.
“A military strike, in my opinion, would be worse than anything,” International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director general Mohamad ElBaradei told Al Arabiya television in an interview aired on Friday.
Oh my God! Worse than ANYTHING? Well, with a name like MOHAMAD, what do you expect? Isn’t that great? The U.N. nuclear watchdog is a Muslim, of course he sides with Iran and against Israel, and spreads dire warnings of terrible consequences if Iran is stopped from conducting a nuclear war against Israel. Especially if it’s the Israelis who do the stopping.
I said a long time ago that the U.N. building, which is situated on the most prime real estate in all Manhattan, would make wonderful condos. Refurbish the place into individual apartments and our government could sell them for millions of dollars each, and create shopping on the ground floor. We could probably pull a couple billion dollars out of that terrorist haven and clean up the quality of the neighborhood clientele in the bargain.
Tags: ElBaradei, Iran, Israel, United Nations
June 21st, 2008 at 6:55 pm
I don’t go for these international organisations either. Some much smaller international organisations might have merit, a body that countries can go to voluntarily to resolve disputes or one that caters for large scale disaster relief perhaps, but this hugely expensive political talking shop in New York has acheived very little since it was set up. Has there ever been any successful UN military intervention? Has its existence ever actually prevented a single conflict?
June 21st, 2008 at 7:13 pm
Here is the same chap downplaying the idea that Syria was attempting to develop a nuclear capability. He is not necessarily wrong but I agree the name does make one suspicious of his views in this arena.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7463044.stm