“INTACT” IS THE OPERATIVE WORD

One of the goals of the Globalists is to keep the world’s infrastructure from being destroyed in war. Ukraine is virtually a sacrificial lamb, as the infrastructure there is being ground into dust in the effort to sap the strength and will of the Russian people.

But think of the destruction if Russia makes war on all of NATO . The Globalists aren’t so much the Presidents and Prime Ministers, I assume most of them are bought and paid for. The Globalist elites are the bankers, the industrialists, who own the steel mills and mining operations, the shipping fleets and manufacturing plants, and they don’t want the sources of their wealth destroyed before they can finish ending nationalism and join the world under one government.

China keeps threatening everyone over Taiwan, but China doesn’t want Taiwan flattened anymore than anyone else does. Taiwan is vital to the global economy. This makes it unlikely that a war will be fought over that island nation and if one is, it will be fought mostly at sea or on some other island.

Kim Jong Asswipe of North Korea is bellowing again about using his nukes, something that would end with his half of that peninsula glowing in the dark from the fires and radiation. Let the fat little bastard yell, it keeps him happy. That reign will end when China finally goes down, and it will.

Intact is the word. Most of the world is already deeply involved in Globalism and can’t survive without it. If you look at any country, most of the goods they eat or use are made somewhere else. Everyone is dependent on their economy for ores, grain, energy, whatever, from other nations. Not one nation on Earth is fully independent anymore and if the global supply system were to collapse, the entire economy of the planet would collapse with it.

The way for the Globalists to rid the Earth of most of it’s human population is not through war, which would wreck all that vital infrastructure, but simply by making an impossible mess out of the global supply system. Mass starvation would rapidly ensue.

This is what I suspect is a goal of at least some of the Elitists, but I don’t think these people are all on the same page with each other. Because of their different interests, t believe they’ve formed separate groups with separate approaches to reaching their one-world government. For instance, the shipping magnates might not be very enthusiastic about seeing the supply system fail, nor those who ship their ores and so forth on the ships.

More and more I’ve come to think that there’s disparity between the Globalists on how to reach their goals and this may end up meaning that things may not happen nearly as fast as some of them have planned. The massive food shortages we’ve been warned about haven’t happened and the price of gasoline is going back down again instead of continuing to rise as we were told it would. This indicates to me a lack of agreement among the Elitists, which is another way of saying that not all Elitists are Globalists.

It’s all still evolving. Watch and wait. If there’s one thing we can always depend on, it’s that rich or poor, people will always fight among themselves for positions of power.