Back in 1967 a couple of guys on horseback with a movie camera went Bigfoot hunting and shot a minute, more or less, of a female Bigfoot or something that looked like one. Now those still alive who had any direct connection to the movie are saying “I wore the fake suit”, “I was the cameraman”, etc. in a new movie saying it was all faked.
These people have made money off that movie with public appearances, endorsements and so forth for 60 years and the only reason I can see for them to now claim it was all a fraud is that the TV interviews and etc. have dried up and this will restart them. I don’t buy it that they were charlatans before but are now honest men, just for the pure sake of it, as it would embarrass the holy hell out of me to say “Yes, I’m a liar, I lied for years for the sake of profit”. Unless, of course, a very lucrative Netflix movie has been made, which it has, that rents right now for $14.99 and is titled “Capturing Bigfoot” to make you think they have proof of a capture, with the lure “old footage found in a safe”. Only after shelling out the $15 and watching it do you discover that even the come-on is a fraud, there’s no “capture” at all.
The only thing they’ve proven by “coming forward” with what’s supposed to be the true story now, is that they’re liars. Because either they lied then, or they’re lying now. So maybe it wasn’t a hoax, maybe this, now, is the hoax. This story doesn’t say right out that Bigfoot doesn’t exist, but that may be its purpose. There’s been a very heavy and continuous presence in the media for a very long time debunking the existence of Bigfoot for no reason I can see, when proving their existence would be front page news and there’s been so many proofs that they do exist. The first media to prove their existence would make a fortune, why aren’t they going after it?
Newspapers in the frontier lands reported events where remote miner’s camps were torn up, sometimes miners were killed, witness descriptions of the assailants said they were huge hairy men. This was back in the early 1800’s with some printed reports that the Indians had always known about them and called them Sasquatch and other names. For instance:
Long-Island Star, 1818: “He is described as bending forward when running, hairy—and the heel of the foot narrow, spreading at the toes.” Sackets-Flarbar, Sept. 8. Report says that in the vicinity of Ellisburgh was seen by a gentleman of unquestioned veracity, an animal resembling the Yo-ho, or Wild Man of the forest”.
“In 1851, the Vermont Watchman and State Journal reported that two men were hunting in Greene County, Arkansas, when they saw something “bearing the unmistakable likeness of humanity” chasing a herd of cattle. “He was of gigantic stature, the body being covered with hair, and the head with long locks that fairly enveloped his neck and shoulders.” The creature stopped and stared at them for a few moments and then ran into a patch of woods “with great speed, leaping from twelve to fourteen feet at a time.” The newspaper went on to explain that sightings of the Wild Man had been reported in St. Francis, Greene, and Poinsett counties since 1834.”
Early settlers have told of direct encounters with these creatures and people in wilderness areas are still encountering them. Giant footprints have been found in remote and desolate places in the US for centuries, all over the country. This is not some modern hoax, this is settlers getting their cabins and themselves attacked, same with miners in remote mountains and modern campers in their tents.
Some say that they must be a fraud because with all the smart phones, no one’s got pictures yet. I doubt that, the same as I doubt that all the photos of UFOs have been made public. More likely, only a few percent have. Most people don’t want to be ridiculed by our government. Plus it’s fair to say that there’s a lot more UFO sightings than Bigfoot sightings.
One more thought on why they seem to be seen less now than they used to even though our population has moved so deeply into what has been their habitat is the same reason you see less of other large animals. Remember that these are related to us, and they’re smart. They know how to hide and they have natural camouflage. They get the hell away from us, and as their habitat shrinks, so do their numbers. It would be no surprise if the Bigfoot were near extinction or already gone.
One last point. I once saw a big mountain lion in 1948 way up on a ridge from the window of our car as my father drove up the Angeles Crest Highway. I have lived in and explored mountain wildernesses for much of my life. I never saw another one. The last acreage I had, about 10 miles from here, I found a lion paw print in the soil, it was a good 5 inches wide. They see you before you see them and if they don’t want to be seen, they won’t be.