In the spirit of always trying to keep up with everything going on, let’s look at Globalism and China, and a few other things.
Klaus Schwab, the face of Globalism and Guru of its dogma, was very recently quoted as saying that the Chinese model of government is a good one for many nations to follow. He stopped short of saying that it’s the one we all should follow, instead hedging by saying that individual nations have to choose their own paths. It looks to me like he’s just keeping the CCP pacified. What he said wasn’t that great an endorsement of them. The Globalists want a unified global government, while the Chinese want a Chinese global government. There will be conflict.
Meanwhile, one of the world’s top economists is predicting a major global economic change, for the worse.
We shouldn’t need experts to tell us this. The global supply chain appears to be damaged beyond repair. Manufacturing is moving out of China and back to its home nations. Nations generally are backing away from doing trade with China. All this means that the global economic system that’s been built up on the basis of trade between China, the USA and the EU is coming undone, causing losses of income worldwide along with increasing unemployment and lower wages for those entering the job market.
Food production is down and will keep going down because our climate is oscillating. The Earth is neither warming nor cooling, on average, but the weather is becoming more extreme. Summers are hotter, winters are colder. This disrupts food production. Many areas that were good for farming certain crops have to grow different crops or even be abandoned.
There’s a direct and concerted effort in the USA and Europe to destroy food production by destroying fertilizer plants, food production and processing facilities, blocking the planting of crops and slaughtering millions of cattle and chickens.
Last, monetary inflation is increasing worldwide and people in the poorest countries are already starting to suffer starvation from being unable to afford the increased cost of food. This time around, no help will be coming from the affluent nations, where food shortages are either expected or are already occurring, so starvation will increase, first in Africa and then in South America and the other continents. Those with the worst overpopulation will suffer first and most.
As starvation spreads in these nations, so will diseases.
Don’t forget also that at least 75% of the world’s population has now been injected with a potion that causes steady damage to the human immune system, making all diseases more contagious to them.
The ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine only figures into all this as just more pressure on the global food supply, and isn’t really a major part of the overall equation of global change. It has an effect but it’s more for distraction.
Now let’s take all this and look to the future. With Earth’s changing climate, which it does all the time, helping along a deliberate food shortage, the global supply chain collapse, the rising costs of food, increasing unemployment caused by lower wages and less available jobs, and damaged immune systems.
It should be clear that we’re heading for a tipping point. It’s obvious that everything is collapsing at once regarding the human support systems that have been building up for centuries. This happened in the Great Depression that started in 1929 because the American stock market crashed. People were thrown out of jobs and there was worldwide suffering and starvation. From just the stock market. Then the Dust Bowl of the Midwest hit, wiping out the food production of the entire central United States.
The stock market hasn’t crashed and I don’t know if it will or not, but when you take away much of the food production and cause global starvation and the global spread of diseases, ON PURPOSE, you have to conclude that there’s going to be a reorganization of national boundaries, just for starters.
The time of nations hasn’t ended, but it’s on its way out. Clearly, getting rid of much of the population is necessary first before a nation can be dissolved and made part of a larger government. Wars are avoided this way, resistance is nullified.
This is the plan. This is how the Earth is going to become Globalized. There’s going to be a lot of different acts in the play, of course. There will probably be local wars, plagues will be spread to help along the genocide, crops will be set on fire, more “vaccination” programs will be enforced and so on. Pressure against survival will seem to come at people from every direction at once.
This whole process is going to take a long time. The Globalists talk about 2050 in vague terms, possibly they see it as a 30 year program. That actually sounds pretty reasonable, it will probably take about that long.
This is why I no longer care about politics. Politics are just noise, just a distraction, like the magician waving his wand in your face while his other hand is the one actually creating the illusion. Don’t be distracted. Get ready.
This is a total load of Socialist/Communist BULL. It’s the big corporations that provide all the economic growth along with most of the employment, not the little stores and shops. It’s a myth propagated by liars that they don’t pay enough taxes, they do, and the reason they don’t pay more is because they use their profits to further grow their businesses, increasing employment and growing the national GDP. This clown wants to break up the big corporations, which would destroy many millions of jobs and make the economic downturn much worse and do it much faster.
The writer hints that Schwab is on the Right, since he supposedly is against the Left. Not true. Globalism is neither Right nor Left, since one is Democrat/Capitalist and the other is Socialist/Communist. Globalism is all about a global government using whatever means will accomplish this, Left or Right, they don’t care.
It makes perfect sense that Klaus Schwab and the WEF would come out against prosperity now, if it will help impoverish average citizens and abet their demise. Remember that a major goal is to decrease the population. First it’s necessary for Globalists to amass great wealth and power, then it’s necessary for them to take as much of that away from everyone else that they can. This is how global control of the Earth is accomplished. But they’re not going to do it by bringing down the corporations, they ARE the corporations. They’re doing it by exercising the power they have in owning those corporations, by blocking the production of food, medicine and other goods, by disabling the supply chains.
The biggest corporations are all run by Globalists and while their profits are decreasing steadily as the economy winds down, why should they care? They already own everything they could possibly want EXCEPT world government.
Hmmm… yep. Now it’s crystal clear. Thank you again for bringing the light to this dark topic.
MSM makes a big confusion when it comes to Economics vs. Politics vs. Ideologics.
That’s another reason why ALL the Conservatives SHOULD read your analysis and appointments.
In a SANE world, everything would be the INVERSE of this crazy reality.
If I was a religion person, I would believe Devil himself rules this world.
This guy give me chills:
https://www.theglobalist.com/world-economic-forum-klaus-schwab-neoliberalism-capitalism-corporate-responsibility/
Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum Run Away from Their Past
We are no fans of neo-liberalism. But look who is now suddenly disavowing it.
When Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum, starts railing against
“the neoliberal global order,” the world should take notice.
The WEF pot calling the kettle black
“For the past 30 to 50 years, the neo-liberalist ideology has increasingly prevailed in large parts of the world.”
And he added:
“This approach centers on the notion that the market knows best, that the ‘business of business is business,’ and that government should refrain from setting clear rules for the functioning of markets.”
Mr. Schwab goes on to solemnly declare:
“Those dogmatic beliefs have proved wrong. But fortunately, we are not destined to follow them.”
US and UK neo-liberal abuses
Don’t get us wrong. The United States’ and UK´s crush on neo-liberalism was a wrong-headed attempt to skew what is in each case an already hyper market-oriented model of politics.
But it is a bit rich (pun fully intended) for the founder of the WEF to protest that. After all, his organization’s entire business model has always rested on providing mega corporations with a PR shield to pretend that they aim to do better — (NB: The emphasis is on “PR” and “shield”).
The World Economic Forum largely built its business license by providing a marketing platform to U.S.-based IT and banking giants.
Thus, one would expect such a broadside coming from a seasoned leftie, rather than from Schwab, who has made it his business — via his confabs the world over — to serve the “aspirational” side of large global corporations.
Corporate window-dressing
These firms have long run campaigns, largely coordinated in the framework of the World Economic Forum to emphasize the benevolent spirit of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Unfortunately, given that U.S. shareholders don’t really want any such forays to amount to more than mere PR maneuvers, the WEF’s projects are always long on aspiration and short on terms of actual delivery of the promised goods.
The exercise thus largely adds up to a smokescreen covering up a sobering economic and social reality. This won’t get any better as Chinese corporations will increasingly fill in for the U.S. corporate side’s largesse.
Direct connection to democracy
As tempting as it may seem for Mr. Schwab and the WEF to disassociate themselves from their erstwhile propulsion vehicles, in the real world this matters very little.
At present, we are dealing with a triple crisis of confidence — lack of confidence in democracy at home, in global institutions and in global corporations.
It is only logical that these three challenges can only be addressed together. And that, in turn, means that we have to modernize our nation-state democratic institutions as well as our network of global institutions — so that they are more responsive to the challenges we are facing.
Too much representation for too little taxation
It also means tackling global mega corporations, especially those based in the United States. Beginning with their often-grotesque tax shenanigans, they are the real free riders in a troubled world.
Their systematic effort to avoid paying their fair share — and thereby to contribute to preserving democracy and fairness in our societies — can no longer be tolerated.
Holding these mega corporations to account firmly — even breaking them up — is in their own collective self-interest.
For unless this happens, the essence of what these companies ultimately depend on the most
— i.e., a consensus in favor of continued global integration — will vanish. It is already brittle enough.